The Treason Trial of Aaron Burr

In the months between and including May and September, in 1807, Aaron Burr was look to by the Supreme Court in Virginia on the press of deception against the United States. During the period of 1804 to 1807, Burr allegedly commit some(prenominal) overt ventures, which are exemplifyions, that may be innocent in themselves, but in combination with the intentions and results of that act, become criminal actions. The rivulet was about treason, which the Constitution defines as levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort, (Art. III, Sect. 3) and the prosecution must(prenominal) prove that Burr committed the overt act with the deposition of two witnesses, for the treason conviction to stand. In this trial, Burrs actions outside of the tell of Virginia have no bearing on the overt act of assembling troops to levy war against the United States, and therefore the majority of his admissible actions occurred on Blennerha ssets Island in Virginia. (Doc 108) Although the prosecution do a strong case for Burrs guilt, the differentiation between his intentions and his actions, his terra firma coat as an American patriot and the lack of cover evidence, sensation must conclude that Aaron Burr is non unrighteous of treason. He perhaps was til now the victim of a big political conspiracy to rid him of all prestige, honor and legacy.

        The prosecution tried to prove that Burr used his power to gain an troops of men to conquer New Orleans, then Mexico and in conclusion represent a refreshful nation composed of the westerly American states and Mexico. T! he fault in their argument is that his actions do not unavoidably point directly towards this conclusion. It is true that Burr wrote garner and even discussed a new war with Spain and the formation of a new nation, If you want to get a full essay, mold it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay